BREAKING NEWS
 

Council staff told: 'Accept cuts to mileage costs or face sack'

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Profile image for Scunthorpe Telegraph

Scunthorpe Telegraph

Three thousand car-owning employees of North Lincolnshire Council face being dismissed and reinstated under a new contract – unless they accept a cut in their mileage allowance.

The dismissal threat came from the authority's chief executive Simon Driver in an open letter attached to their monthly pay packets.

  1. letter:  Chief executive of North Lincolnshire Council Simon Driver

    LETTER: Chief executive of North Lincolnshire Council Simon Driver

In the letter, Mr Driver insists the mileage changes – aimed at saving taxpayers more than £600,000 a year by cutting mileage payments from 52p to 45p a mile – have to be implemented by October 1.

Mr Driver said: "We intend to dismiss and re-engage our employees should agreement not be reached on these changes.

ARE YOU DECORATING? WE HAVE UP TO 30% OFF ON SELECTED BLINDS POP...

Grimsby Sunblinds

View details

30% off on our collection range and other selected fabrics. alternatively call 809887 and we will bring our samples to you for our friendly hassle free quote.

Contact: 01472 809887

Valid until: Saturday, July 13 2013

"This is not a step we wish to take and acceptance of these changes to mileage rates will mean this will not be necessary.

"All employees would then receive a new contract of employment with the council which will include the amended terms and conditions relating to payment of mileage."

The 2,000-strong Unison branch has warned that if the threat was carried out, there could be hundreds of claims for unfair dismissal from sacked employees and the withdrawal of many private cars for council work.

The council, faced with having to save around £25 million by 2014-15, is proposing to remove the essential user lump sum for car owners and to introduce a standard rate of 45p per mile for both essential and casual users.

But Unison spokesman Matthew Clarke said: "Without payment of this allowance, staff will be expected to subsidise the local authority to use their own cars.

"However, there are many staff receiving the payment who are low paid and many will not be able to afford their cars without the allowance."

As an alternative to employee vehicles, the council has proposed the use of a pool car system but the unions have rejected the idea as "unworkable" and costing more than the targeted savings.

A council spokesman said: "Dismissal and re-engagement of employees is the due legal process necessary in order to make changes to terms and conditions of employment and then only in the event that agreement could not be reached.

"We will continue working hard with employees and trade unions to mitigate the effects of these proposals."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for buffering

    by buffering

    Thursday, June 21 2012, 11:13AM

    “Oh well, look on the bright side, the AA have reported that the cost of petrol has dropped by 4p a litre over the last 2 months so if these employees drop their speed they won't even notice the difference.”

  • Profile image for nick_nick_

    by nick_nick_

    Tuesday, June 19 2012, 8:00PM

    “@hatty, yes i agree so much. get rid of suubsidised housing and other benefits (except for them that do really need it, pay full price for the pods as it will save my money.
    pay for an ambulance? gladly. if i could opt out of the nhs i would, i know if i paid my NI too a private firm like bupa (other health care is available) i would get a much better service.
    scrap the park n ride as no one uses the town center anyway”

  • Profile image for HattyTood

    by HattyTood

    Tuesday, June 19 2012, 2:53PM

    “by TimothyIngbitTuesday, June 19 2012, 10:37AM

    "..... So in short, these mileage allowances and many other things must be cut."

    Care to make a list of the 'many other things' ?

    I know, lets start with subsidised housing and council tax, followed by paying for an ambulance if you have an accident. Then there's the long list of consessions available for entrance to things like the Museum, Pods, Swimming pools, etc. How about charging £2 per car down at the local tip (sorry, recycling center) and scrapping that park n ride bus that's always empty. In fact we could just hand everything over to the private sector, they have no qualms about closing anything that doesn't make a profit, never mind break even.

    I'll see you in the dole queue in a month ;)”

  • Profile image for TimothyIngbit

    by TimothyIngbit

    Tuesday, June 19 2012, 10:37AM

    “Mr. PF, you may well be correct to say that greed and bloat are not confined to the public sector. However, when a private company loses money it goes bankrupt, when a government department loses money it simply goes back to the taxpayer pot to get more. This can no longer be sustained. Regarding health and education, it must be accepted that whatever payback there may be later it is still at a cost that must be borne now by the taxpayer. The private sector provides both the resources now and the means for said educated people to produce further resources in the future. Simply put, taxpayers are providing for government not the other way around. It is also true that superior examples of both can be found in the private sector and we need to adjust our mindset that only government can provide quality health and education. The financial crisis was caused by the credit boom that preceded it. That boom was caused by government and central bank mismanagement of monetary policy. The banks simply reacted to governments efforts to boost credit in the economy because Keynesian economic orthodoxy dictates this as a primary means of achieving economic growth. All it really created was a mass insolvency that colossal government overspend definitely played its part in. So in short, these mileage allowances and many other things must be cut.”

  • Profile image for nick_nick_

    by nick_nick_

    Monday, June 18 2012, 4:11PM

    “@ hatty todd,
    maybe you should bring this up at your next council meeting?”

  • Profile image for buffering

    by buffering

    Monday, June 18 2012, 2:58PM

    “by Phred_Fillips
    It wasn't the public sector that caused the economic crisis; it was the private sector bankers; their wayward ways being initionally sponsored by Maggie Thatcher's 'free economy', - a system that was beyond the control of the mush depleted public sector's bank regulator.
    ….......................................
    Yawn! The Left Wingers will never accept that Gordon Brown spent 13 long years milking the city of London and the Banking sector for the massive amounts of taxes that it paid. The highest single tax contributor in the entire country. Hang on, 13 years in power! Doesn't that mean that they also had 13 years to put safeguards in place? Don't be silly, Tony and Gordon also spent 13 years inflating the Public Sector to the tune of some extra 800,000 workers, mostly unnecessary, but hey, nothing like buying votes eh!!

    So, with a gargantuan Public Sector, mostly with tax payer funded final salary pensions schemes, who, or should I say from where. do you think the money comes from to fund those pensions? You guessed it, those nasty Banks that have to take risks to earn you things like interest!!!”

  • Profile image for HattyTood

    by HattyTood

    Monday, June 18 2012, 2:55PM

    “Great idea nick_nick_

    Do you happen to have a timetable of buses/trains that STILL visit every village in a 15 mile radius on the hour, every hour, 7 days a week ?

    oh yeah, weekend working applies ... and usually with no premium attached.”

  • Profile image for nick_nick_

    by nick_nick_

    Monday, June 18 2012, 9:00AM

    “simple answer to this.
    use public transport!”

  • Profile image for Phred_Fillips

    by Phred_Fillips

    Sunday, June 17 2012, 11:04PM

    “@TimothyIngbit....perhaps you would like to extend your debate re the 'productive private sector' and the 'unproductive public sector'.
    As major sectors of te public sector are education and health, these are essential components of promoting, maintaining and increasing the efficieny and potential of the private sector their contribution to the economy is vital.
    Without education, the private sector would be impotent; without a public health service one could kiss goodbye to a healthy private sector workforce.
    It wasn't the public sector that caused the economic crisis; it was the private sector bankers; their wayward ways being initionally sponsored by Maggie Thatcher's 'free economy', - a system that was beyond the control of the mush depleted public sector's bank regulator.
    It is not necessarily the public sector that suffers greed and becomes bloated.”

  • Profile image for Bill_Igerent

    by Bill_Igerent

    Sunday, June 17 2012, 1:52PM

    “Might just come in useful; says he reaching up & blowing dust from old copy of Oxford concise!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article