Scunthorpe M&S retail park planning application change

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Profile image for Scunthorpe Telegraph

Scunthorpe Telegraph

The firm behind the proposed M&S retail park in Scunthorpe has applied to change a condition of its planning permission.

Simons Developments is looking to create the park, which will include Marks & Spencer and Debenhams.

North Lincolnshire Council awarded planning permission for the project in March.

This came on the condition no more than five per cent of the trading space was used for selling convenience goods.

NEED A NEW BOILER ?. THEN READ OUR REVIEWS & CALL P & P PLUMBING...

P&P Plumbing & Heating services

View details

Print voucher

IF YOUR LOOKING AT REPLACING YOUR BOILER, THEN CALL, P & P PLUMBING. WE CAN SUPPLY & FIT BOILERS, TO SUIT ALL BUDGETS, & THEY COME WITH 3, 5, 7 & AN AMAZING 10 YEARS PARTS & LABOUR GUARANTEE.

Terms: Ts & Cs apply

Contact: 01472 803004

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

Councillors imposed the condition to limit the adverse impact on Scunthorpe town centre.

But Simons officials have now applied for the change so retailers other than M&S can stock a small range of convenience goods, including sandwiches and confectionery.

This would ensure they would not be in breach of the planning permission.

The council's decision to grant planning permission for the retail park is currently subject to a judicial review, which will be heard in Leeds next month.

The application to change the condition is set to be determined by February 7.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for DFlated

    by DFlated

    Saturday, November 17 2012, 7:49AM

    “Free trade. It's like Des .COMerford worried about this development - you have to up your game or like he does start up a website and look into out of town outlets yourself.

    Retail is changing from 1970's style town centres. Keep up or go down. We are in the 21st Century for God's sake. I bet some of you on here would have complained about the invention of the wheel or the earth is still flat.”

  • Profile image for buffering

    by buffering

    Friday, November 16 2012, 8:45PM

    “Going by the amount of negative arrows on my comment it appears that many people don't care much for the "rule of law". Maybe they'll also not be bothered if their house gets broken into or their car stolen and the same Blasé attitude about the law is given to them...

    Just because someones relatives want to buy their favourite liver paté or 15 denier tights from Marks and Sparks, doesn't mean that it's right for the planning commitee to ignore the planning laws.

    I doubt very much that their isn't a single descent person in the town that doesn't want new stores and more choice on their doorstep, but the law is the law and no one, regardless of how many of the blue rinse brigade friends they have, is above that law.”

  • Profile image for IT_MAN

    by IT_MAN

    Friday, November 16 2012, 7:23PM

    “Must be worried in case people go there instead of Tesco for sandwiches, must protect Tesco's trade.”

  • Profile image for anth8h

    by anth8h

    Friday, November 16 2012, 4:51PM

    “Apologies buffering,looks like I got it wrong.”

  • Profile image for normanengland

    by normanengland

    Friday, November 16 2012, 8:32AM

    “This development will bring much trade into the town. Relatives who live out of town are looking forward to this, but have stated that a town centre location would not tempt them. Seems that the only people who want M&S in the town centre are those who think their own business would benefit from being next door.”

  • Profile image for localad

    by localad

    Thursday, November 15 2012, 10:34PM

    “Just get the thing built, we need the jobs.”

  • Profile image for buffering

    by buffering

    Thursday, November 15 2012, 8:55PM

    “by anth8h

    "Delaying tactics whilst hoping in the meantime M & S will get fed up and move elsewhere?
    Potential jobs lost as well!"

    Not quite sure about this comment as it clearly states that it's The Simons group that have applied for a change of condition on its planning conditions. So given that they're the ones enticing M&S to be the anchor store I can hardly see how you can call it delaying tactics. Had they done their sequential testing in the first place then they would have know that there is no real demand for this development as there is plenty of available space already in existence and would now not be being required to change the whole plan.

    Likewise, had the NLC planning committee not broken every single planning regulation so as to facilitate them, then this whole saga would now not be wasting tens of thousands of tax payers money by dragging it through the judicial court process.”

  • Profile image for anth8h

    by anth8h

    Thursday, November 15 2012, 11:37AM

    “Delaying tactics whilst hoping in the meantime M & S will get fed up and move elsewhere?
    Potential jobs lost as well!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article