Sign up to help our Humber Bridge tolls fight
THE Scunthorpe Telegraph is today urging readers to back our fight to scrap Humber Bridge tolls or reduce them to just £1 for cars.
You are being asked to sign our A Toll Too Far petition, calling for the Government to enable this to happen by cancelling the landmark's £330-million debt.
-

The Humber Bridge spanning the River Humber.
Picture by Paul Torrie.-CF-
The call follows a report that revealed reducing the toll could benefit North Lincolnshire's economy by a share of a massive £1-billion over the next 25 years.
People can put their name to the petition by filling out a coupon in today's Scunthorpe Telegraph or by completing the form by clicking here.
Scunthorpe MP Elliot Morley gave his support to the campaign.
He said: "I think there is certainly a good argument for the Government to respond to in terms of reducing tolls and all of the local MPs are prepared to make it.
"I think presenting the case to reduce the tolls as an economic argument for the regeneration of the region is a very good approach."
The campaign is being run in conjunction with our sister newspapers the Hull Daily Mail and the Grimsby Telegraph.
And after yesterday’s launch of a study into the economic impact into the Humber Bridge tolls, Cleethorpes MP Shona McIsaac, whose constituency includes Barton-Upon-Humber, also backed the campaign.
She said: “I think a substantial reduction – the report suggests a £1 toll – would certainly put a lot more money into the local economy but still provide sufficient funds to maintain the bridge.”
Also giving his backing to the campaign, Brigg and Goole MP Ian Cawsey said: “This is about the future of the region and, through that, what role the region plays in the national economy.”
Mr Cawsey said chief executive of the Chamber of Commerce Ian Kelly would meet with MPs, council, business and campaigning representatives ‘in the next few weeks’ to discuss the full report.
The Humber Bridge was built with the aid of a £90-million loan, which has escalated to £350-million – more than three times the cost to construct it.
Every year, at least 75 per cent of the £21-million made from 6.6-million journeys goes to service the debt.
The Scunthorpe Telegraph is urging the Government to write off the Humber Bridge debt, which currently stands at £333-million.
In order to meet the annual £3-million running cost of maintaining the bridge, vehicles, which made more than 6.6 million journeys across the bridge last year, need pay no more than £1 each way to help towards the upkeep of the landmark.
Currently, a proposed 20p rise would result in the return cost of crossing the bridge increasing to £5.80 for car drivers.
Lorry drivers face a rise of up to £1.60, meaning a return crossing would cost £39.80 should the new charges go ahead.
For a comprehensive five-page report on the tolls issue, buy today's Scunthorpe Telegraph.
It includes more reaction from politicians, including Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, local businesses, the Humber Bridge Board, Department of Transport and residents.
There's also the coupon you can sign to back our campaign.
Alternatively, you can back it online by clicking here.
View our video from Westminster by clicking here.







31 Comments
View all
by dawn b, scunthorpe
Saturday, October 25 2008, 2:03PM
“i agree that it is disgusting that if your visiting prisoners in hull its toll free while if your visiting patients or are a patient you have to pay i have recently been a patient in hull royal and my family and friends not only had the extortionate bridge tolls but the high parking fees and fuel costs to pay so i was very grateful to eceive my visitorsand as i have to go back for more treatment 5 days a week for 4 weeks i am looking to have to do this without a family member and using the hospital transport to get there, whereas if there were no tolls it would be easier tome to justify them taking me although i have said i am not bothered and i will be ok deep down i believe it would benefit me to have someone with me. on the lines of more trade and better economy it was pointed out to me that if access to hull was easier it may take some trade from scunthorpe which is not good but then it might work the other way and scunthorpe might get more visitors . not knowing a great deal about politics etc i am giving a humble opinion that i believe the tolls should be at least reduced do a trial period. but surely people who are ill deserve a free trip across that flaming bridge, and a visit they havent done anything wrong unlike a prisoner who gets a visistor or two free!!”
by alan s, barton
Friday, October 10 2008, 5:35AM
“never mind using the bridge ,boring way to get to hull anyway.bring back the ferry ,travelling on the ferry was a lot more fun .relaxing pint..better views ,fresh air.and no tolls alan from barton”
by Chez, Wootton
Thursday, October 09 2008, 12:13PM
“Why don't they give it a months trial and scrap the cost all together and lets see how the local economy grows, if at all?”
by Ann Milner, Scunthorpe
Thursday, October 09 2008, 11:05AM
“To make better use of the bridge.”
by Grandadpop, Scunthorpe
Thursday, October 09 2008, 9:38AM
“S.J. of Scunthorpe.
Your revelations concerning the 'Florida experience' seem quite sensible and (in my opinion) deserve some follow up.
My only concern would be that to 'follow it up' would involve a deputation of local councillors flying out to Florida, to investigate the scheme and adapt it to local conditions...at our expense, of course!
Otherwise I like it. Sounds good to me.”
by SJ, Scunthorpe
Thursday, October 09 2008, 8:42AM
“When I visited Florida there were a number of toll booths there, normally costing no more than $1 to use. This is obviously quite cheap but with numerous tolls the costs soon add up. So they had something called a sunpass for local residents. I believe it is some form of annual permit local residents are able to buy. I don't know the exact cost of this but I was told by a Floridian that it was quite cheap, it meant they didn't have to queue for the tolls as they could drive straight through, and they made huge savings. Could the Humber Bridge board not bring something like this in? Local residents who use the bridge daily to commute, or for business would obviously benefit, and it would cut congestion at the booths. At the same time a similar measure could be brought in for those using the bridge for medical treatment, although I think this should be subsidised or paid for by the government (wishful thinking??!!)
I do agree that the tolls should be reduced to help the economy, and I think a measure like this would be quite helpful. Obviously the annual price of a pass such as this would need to be sunstantially cheaper than what people are paying now. A toll of £1 per crossing would equate to about £520 a year if you were crossing the bridge twice a day for five days every week. So would an annual pass of £450 - £500 work? Something to think about maybe?”
by M.Norris, Barrow on Humber
Thursday, October 09 2008, 8:28AM
“Tory or Labour isn't the issue so peoples political offiliations are not needed. The bridge according to one leading engineer who helped construct the bridge had the opportunity to have the debt written off in 81 on completion. However as always greed interceeded on the part of local government at the time and we end up with this 'White Elephant ' of a debt that can never be repaid even with continual price hikes. The implications of the bridge and its tolls do and always will have a detrimental effect on the local economies be it North or South of the Humber the flow of labour and commerce are restricted by this cost as ADA from Barton pointed out its £1800 a year to cross the bridge and no ones salary can take a hit like that for long especially in todays economic climate. Abolish the toll completely forget drops to a pound, its a road like any other let it come under the highways department theres enough roadtax paid to fund it, or make it free to local residents and businesses that is those living and working in the North Lincolnshire and Humberside areas who are most effected by the cost of the bridge.”
by bob, Scunthorpe
Thursday, October 09 2008, 6:18AM
“Sorry to hijack but wheres the story of NLC losing 11m of tax payers money in the failed icelandic bank! Prolly a Tory idea mebbe!”
by hayley, Scunthorpe
Wednesday, October 08 2008, 11:48PM
“I think its insulting and wrong that travelling over the bridge to see prisoners is free off the toll change yet visiting a sick or even dying patient in Hulls hospitals is changed.”
by Stu, Englishman in my castle.
Wednesday, October 08 2008, 10:36PM
“Apparently the government have stated that the tolls aren't their concern, it's a 'local issue' and the local councils problem! Well, that's passed the buck then! Are you going to tell me that our esteemed local Labour MPs didn't know this? The petition is nothing more than a red herring, a smoke screen to enhance their standing in the local community, just like the sham that was the Post Office closures. I can't wait for the elections!! So, Morley and Causey et al, had a grand day out (on expenses no doubt) FOR NO GOOD REASON! It's all one big con. They are treating us like the proverbial mushroom, keeping us in the dark and feeding us a load of s**t! Well done Kirky & NLC, enjoy while you can...”